On Sunday 09 July 2006 13:34, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > Then we need to have the sack to say "we're forking RPM," and take the > abuse that comes with it. Because this half-assed selective uptake stuff > is just making us look bad. > > So is Fedora the tail that wags the dog here? Do we just Take The > Decision, or do we try to figure out why RH engineering is unwilling to > take a public stance first? If I'm not mistaken, the Fedora Board was discussing this very issue on Friday. I overheard as much. I do not know what decisions were made, if any, perhaps it would be time to get a report from the board regarding this. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpwJwhvoXmpg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
