On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 18:52 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 03:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I would like to hear a decision on this being made by our counsel. We > > have included Mono in Fedora on the basis of OIN > > (http://openinventionnetwork.com/). OIN covers the Linux kernel as one > > of its many components protected by it. Would this be enough for > > Fedora > > to include and build the NTFS module in the kernel package? > > Actually, it would be just build and distribute the NTFS module. We > already include it in source form as part of the kernel srpm. > > On a different note, I understand the OIN protects us as we distribute, > how does it protect others as they REdistribute? Is there any > protection? Has anyone taken up the banner for this issue? I hate to be a finger pointer, but since this may involve discussion with Red Hat's legal department, we outside folks may not be able to handle it. I'm sorry I didn't put in a +1 on this issue earlier, I plumb forgot. Referring back to earlier discussions, it seems there's a LOT of interest in fixing this situation. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
