On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 12:02 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 12:09:03PM -0400, Will Woods wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 10:58 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > > > > > I think Jeremy's fear about misattribution of bugs is a valid one. > > > > > > I have a dream, though. > > > > > > I have a dream of a desktop bugzilla client in Fedora. When you find a > > > bug, you fire up the prominently-placed client. The client presents you > > > with package names, and you select which package the bug was in. The > > > client will be smart enough to reconcile any questions about "which repo > > > this package came from". > > > > > > Is this a crazy dream? Maybe. Maybe not. But it'd certainly require a > > > visionary QA person to make it happen. Right, Will? > > > > Yes! I have this same dream! I really REALLY want to see tighter > > integration between Fedora and our bug reporting/tracking stuff. I want: > > > > 1) A nice client (maybe built from bug-buddy) for people to quickly and > > easily report bugs *without a bugzilla account*. This client would > > gather pertinent system info (Fedora or Alternatives package? Weirdo > > kernel?) and include it in the bug report. > > Could it do things like refuse to report bugs from machines that have > tainted kernels? Or is that being too harsh in some peoples opinions? Too harsh. The problem might be completely unrelated to the modules. Rahul
