On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 09:49:24AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > >How do you define "same package quality" if it's an alternate > >implementation? > > It follows the same packaging standards, review process, etc... > > >And starting to get bug reports from J. Foo's Fedora > >that has a drastically different kernel or glibc or ... is going to make > >things very very difficult for developers. > > Not for you, for whoever is maintaining the Alternatives pkg. And how to you prevent users from filing bugs in Fedora bugzilla for Alternatives packages? Unless a totally different bugzilla is used, I can see a bugzilla nightmare. Even with that, you're going to get lots of reports from people that are using a non-Core kernel in bugzilla and it will be a burden. josh
