On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 10:44 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > Yeah, it's also the wrong conversation to have at this point. Need to > figure out 1. what you want to host and 2. what the social structures > might look like around that. Those two items will drive your choice of > SCM and hosting technology. i.e. Want something with centralized > development and avoid forks? Use SVN/CVS. Want something that allows > for local forks and encourages local (non-central) hacks? Use GIT/hg. I think what we're looking for is something that allows: 1. easy creation of new projects for people with fedora-related ideas 2. easy adding/handling of users and groups so the fedora-admin list doesn't need to be involved if someone wants to give access to another fedora contributor 3. probably something that allows a bit of divergence and eases merging back - one of the reasons I'm interested in git/hg. -sv