On Monday 05 June 2006 19:24, Max Spevack <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > Also, note that with the announcement of the "Red Hat Open Testing > > Project to get a name in the future" that there's some desire to see > > under the Fedora umbrella, there is some thought going into what's going > > to be needed for a "new project". I expect that to not be a short > > process to figure out or get through, though. > > This came up at the Fedora BoF. What we need to do, quite simply, is > clarify (and then adhere to) two sets of guidelines: > > 1. Official Fedora Projects behave as such..... > - clear leadership > - email list, irc, cvs (if needed) > - home on the wiki > - scheduled meetings, public minutes/summaries > - public roadmap > - accountable to Fedora Board for leadership and progress > - etc. > > 2. Fedora Incubator Projects behave as such..... > - email list > - wiki page > - seeing critical mass of participation and progress > - guidance from the rest of Fedora > - etc. > > These guidelines have come together organically -- most of us can probably > enumerate many of the requirements of each, as I have tried to do above. > > Someone (it could be me, but I'd like to see someone else who has more > cycles and time to devote directly to it) needs to write a draft, and then > we can review it on this list and publicize it. > > Any volunteers? No reason we can't get this done by the end of the week, > if someone can step up and own it. > > w.r.t the interviews -- I say let him run them, and it's on *us* to figure > out what part of the Fedora umbrella those should be under. > I've started a new wiki page for this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DefiningProjects ...and the flood gates have been opened. ;-) -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpHBbXbKFZvQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
