On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:41 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:30:57AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 00:17 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > 2. Placement of community seats: > > > a. Do we have elections or is it all placed? > > > i. If elections how often to have elections (proposed: every 2 > > > releases) > > > > I thought the suggestion was to stagger things -- essentially, have an > > election every release but only turn over half of the community seats. > > This will help to ensure continuity and "memory" > > I (and others) have been pushing for that in the current FESCo discussions. > But, I don't think the seats _have_ to be turned over. It is an election, so > if the same people get elected again that's fine too. It's more about the > length of a term and making sure the stagger is setup so that at most half the > seats can be turned at one time. Right, my wording was imprecise. The seats don't have to be turned over, just up for re-election Jeremy
