On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 14:40 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > ... or maybe, we just roll the things which don't meet the above up and > > call them a SIG? > > +1 to this. > > Basically: PMCs demand coordination and communication. SIGs don't. > > So we can have the "Anaconda SIG" and the "stateless SIG" and the "Live CD > SIG" and the "Fedora Games SIG", and it's a fancy name for... a mailing > list? List plus potentially some hosting of $SCM and potentially a way to push some releases if we're talking about something that's a software project. It just seems weird to call what's actually a software project a SIG. And I think the needs of the two are somewhat different and should be handled a little differently, but we can take it as it comes. I think it does mean that our number of "projects" is less, but perhaps that's a good thing anyway Jeremy
