On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 20:59 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi all! > > Just FYI, the Fedora Extras Steering Commitee is now round about a year > old and it's time for a rotations/some fresh blood and ideas. I proposed > a rough plan for that in > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-April/msg01383.html > > The current plan is to let all extras packagers vote people that > nominated theirself for FESCo. The nomination to a public list should > include a section with a short mission statement with goals, objectives, > etc. > > The plan is to let the newly elected FESCo elect the (new) chairman -- > or does the Fedora Board want to get /should be involved in that > process, too? I dont think the board needs to get involved with it other than watching closely the discussions and results of the process. Considering that we are still evolving the governance model and there is more questions than answers with how the end result should look like even when applying similar processes to the board itself, any direct involvement from the board within FESCo wouldnt yield much benefits. Rahul
