On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi all!
Just FYI, the Fedora Extras Steering Commitee is now round about a year
old and it's time for a rotations/some fresh blood and ideas. I proposed
a rough plan for that in
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-April/msg01383.html
The current plan is to let all extras packagers vote people that
nominated theirself for FESCo. The nomination to a public list should
include a section with a short mission statement with goals, objectives,
etc.
The plan is to let the newly elected FESCo elect the (new) chairman --
or does the Fedora Board want to get /should be involved in that
process, too?
I don't see any reason why FESCo shouldn't elect their own chairman.
In fact, I think the Board should pay attention to how you handle your
elections, and take some ideas for our own policies.
--Max
--
Max Spevack
+ gpg key -- http://people.redhat.com/~mspevack/mspevack.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
