On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 00:35 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I was corresponding with RMS earlier after a brief discussion in the > earlier advisors list and he brought in the point that the current > guidelines allow open source licenses which FSF consider's non-free. A > mail to licensing@xxxxxxx will get FSF to evaluate a license an a post > will be made to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html on FSF's > opinion. There have been apprehensions about getting into political > maneuvering which is valid concern to a good extend but this is > something worth exploring. I think that what we've seen from Matt Domsch's email is that there are more licenses in Fedora that are not even OSI-compliant than are in the zone of "OSI-certified but non-free". If we clean our house to follow our own more explicit guidelines, we get free for free. M
