On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 17:50 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2006, 11:26 -0400 schrieb Max Spevack: > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 23:44 -0400, Max Spevack wrote: > > >> + Producing frequent "Fedora Status Reports" > > >> - aggregating status reports from all PMC's (monthly) > > >> - Fedora Board status reports > > >> - Messaging of progress through RHAT and community > > >> - If we do it right, this *shouldn't* be that much work > > >> - mspevack volunteers for ownership > > > > > > I believe I have already pointed out that I have this effort running > > > currently (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/WeeklyReports/Archive) > > > which is precisely meant to do what you in mind. Of course more > > > contributions are always welcome. > > > > Yep, it's a matter of building on that and making it even better than it > > already is. That's why it shouldn't be too hard -- it's already mostly > > done. > > The weekly reports worked better in the beginning -- it seems to me that > they stalled a bit. Why? Well, for Extras this is my fault because I > stopped writing them after I got the impression that other > Fedora-Subprojects stopped writing them, too. I counted on various people within the individual sub projects to provide updates rather me trying to keep track of everything. For some reason or the other not many have did it continuously. It's a relatively simple task if contributors involved with the sub project share the work. That has worked out well for the release notes. Rahul
