On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 16:56 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > On Wednesday 07 June 2006 11:46, "Chitlesh GOORAH" > <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 6/7/06, Patrick W. Barnes <nman64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > That's definitely great progress. I didn't use the Interview idea in my > > > example because of any fault in the idea, but rather that it illustrated > > > my point brilliantly. The only thing that went wrong is that the project > > > didn't get enough review before being presented to the general public. > > > > >From my point of view, Fedora Interview would be best in > > Fedoranews.org rather than in f-p.org, don't you think ? > > These are the kinds of ideas and discussions that were skipped. ;-) +1. Thus the mailing lists rather than IRC (see previous comment this thread). -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
