Re: virt-manager without KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You're right, that's a dependancy problem with Ubuntu. You shouldn't need KVM just to run virt-manager.

I would check out the Ubuntu bug tracking database for virt-manager and file a bug.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager

-ben

 "UNIX is user-friendly, it's just picky about its friends."

On Mon, 18 May 2009, David H. Vree wrote:

I would like to run virt-manager on a number of Ubuntu 9.04 desktop boxes to manage virtual machines I have running on an Ubuntu Server box. However, when I select virt-manager for installation in the repo's it indirectly selects kvm as a dependency. However I do not need nor want kvm on these client workstations as all my virtual machines are on the server. Installing KVM on the client workstations loads the intel-kvm kernel module which interferes with other software running on these machines.

Does virt-manager really require KVM to be running locally? Is there a way to get virt-manager up and running without KVM?

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools


_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux