You're right, that's a dependancy problem with Ubuntu. You shouldn't need
KVM just to run virt-manager.
I would check out the Ubuntu bug tracking database for virt-manager and
file a bug.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager
-ben
"UNIX is user-friendly, it's just picky about its friends."
On Mon, 18 May 2009, David H. Vree wrote:
I would like to run virt-manager on a number of Ubuntu 9.04 desktop boxes to
manage virtual machines I have running on an Ubuntu Server box. However,
when I select virt-manager for installation in the repo's it indirectly
selects kvm as a dependency. However I do not need nor want kvm on these
client workstations as all my virtual machines are on the server. Installing
KVM on the client workstations loads the intel-kvm kernel module which
interferes with other software running on these machines.
Does virt-manager really require KVM to be running locally? Is there a way
to get virt-manager up and running without KVM?
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
