On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 13:07 -0600, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > I am a python guy myself, but I will try to take a look. I really > like what you are doing with cft and would hate to see the concept > die. You don't know if there is a similar function in ralsh? No, ralsh doesn't do that; cft requires some more intimate knowledge of the system (e.g., it takes a snapshot of the rpm DB at the start of a session, and tracks file changes using fam/inotify) It just occurred to me that it might be possible to sidestep the whole ruby-rpm issue by shelling out to rpm - that might be an easier way to resurrect cft than fixing the ruby-rpm bindings. David _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
