Cole Robinson wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:10:18PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >>> The attached patch adds a libvirt-storage-aware browser, to replace the >>> standard file chooser when adding storage on remote connections. >>> Screenshot here: >>> >>> http://fedorapeople.org/~crobinso/virt-manager/vmm-storage-browse.png >>> >>> (Greyed out pools are inactive.) >>> >>> In the near future, this will be enabled for local connections as well, >>> which will allow provisioning more complex storage on demand, as well as >>> encourage all storage to go through the libvirt APIs (while still >>> allowing the use of unmanaged storage through the 'Browse local' option, >>> or manually entering a path). Before we turn it on in the local case >>> though, default pool setup needs to be more configurable and robust. >> Personally I'd turn it on for both local & remote usage right away. With >> real users trying it out all the time, it'll quickly get debugged & more >> robust. I think having & documenting 2 different ways of doing storage >> will cause more trouble that you'll save. >> > > Yeah, I'm unsure on the whole thing, but I'm leaning in your direction > now. The situation with file browsing is just as confusing if running as > nonroot at the moment, and the storage dialog will enable better > functionality. The big issue is that this is new UI and there are no > docs to point at when users have questions. More work for me I suppose :) > > I'll enable this for storage provisioning with the new release, not > local install media though (since we really don't have anything storage > pool related hooked up cleanly for this case). > Applied now, with the above defaults change. Thanks, Cole _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
