On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:50:36PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > This is a regression over previous releases, where -l works for both. > > (And that was a good fix, since people *always* accidentally use -l > > instead of -c and get very confused. Can it be fixed? > > That was a bug in a previous release. One of those bugs users love :) > We need to have distinct meaning for them, because many distros images > & hypervisors will support both kernel+initrd and BIOS based > provisioning, so we need to be able to distinguish between them. Isn't the correct solution to add another virt type (--hvm-whatever), not make life miserable for the users? At the *very* least, can't we decide whether to try kernel+initrd based upon detected OS type? I have a queued patch that adds 'os_type' to each of the OSDistro classes. regards john _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
