Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> No, that's exactly why we shouldn't take a URI. openAuth requires user >>> interaction, so that's unavoidably application specific. We just need >>> a helper in virtinst/cli.py for the command line tools to use to create >>> their connection object, and virt-manager already knows how to do >>> authentication. So everything should just pass ina connection object >>> instead of URI. >>> >>> Daniel >> Ahh okay, that makes sense. I'll remove the option to pass a URI then, >> since we really shouldn't even encourage passing a URI and expecting >> the library to open it. > > Just don't remove it from the existing Guest modules, because Koan is > relying on this API to remain stable & since Koan is local only it > doesn't have to worry about auth. > > Daniel Right understandably we need to maintain the existing expected behavior. - Cole _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
