Re: Seperate mailing lists revisited?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Eckersberg wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael DeHaan wrote:
| With Cobbler, virsh, and virt-manager both getting a lot of traffic now
| (which is great!), I'm thinking we might want to revisit the idea of
| having seperate mailing lists.   Other similar projects like
| ovirt/func/etc have seperate lists, for instance.
|
| By default we could auto-invite everyone here to the new cobbler list,
| but we would not auto-subscribe everyone because that may not be desired.
|
| Thoughts?
|
| --Michael
|
| _______________________________________________
| et-mgmt-tools mailing list
| et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
| https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

Yes separate lists would be nice.

- --
John Eckersberg
Production Operations
Red Hat, Inc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkhqUREACgkQO5VSO/Qqm+iSNwCdG6vDSM5XEZ4k+DKyCkZheCRN
2F8AoLBmFAt7wVMGM4Qx9xKbcNyutXmT
=CsWr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

I will make it so.  Details TBD.

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux