Re: Seperate mailing lists revisited?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




+1 for separate list.


2008/7/1 Michael DeHaan <mdehaan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
With Cobbler, virsh, and virt-manager both getting a lot of traffic now (which is great!), I'm thinking we might want to revisit the idea of having seperate mailing lists.   Other similar projects like ovirt/func/etc have seperate lists, for instance.

By default we could auto-invite everyone here to the new cobbler list, but we would not auto-subscribe everyone because that may not be desired.

Thoughts?

--Michael

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux