On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 04:48:47AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 08:14:55PM -0700, David Lutterkort wrote: > > > > > --- virtinst--devel.orig/virt-unpack 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500 > > > > +++ virtinst--devel/virt-unpack 2008-06-26 10:30:45.000000000 -0400 > > > > > > Why isn't this called virt-convert? I don't see any actually "unpacking" > > > going on here. > > > > Calling it virt-pack is more a historical accident. I think renaming it > > to virt-convert makes sense. It'll require some small changes in the > > command line switches though, so you cna say from what format and to > > what format you want to convert. > > Indeed. I have some comments on that too. What I'd like to see is > something like the logic below. I may even be sending patches to do > this, if I can get some consensus. > > virt-convert [-i ifmt] -o ofmt input [output] [snip rest of example] I think this makes alot of sense - it is definitely important to have the command line syntax support multiple formats, even if we've only got an impl for vmware so far. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
