Yep it was heading that way, and it's name was historical based on the
original virt-pack work. Either way is fine with me, I figured getting a
couple formats out there first and then rebasing the master conversion
program to virt-convert might be easier once the few types of
conversions had been used a bit to beat out any potential bugs.
David Lutterkort wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 03:32 +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:32:11AM -0400, Joey Boggs wrote:
--- virtinst--devel.orig/virt-unpack 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ virtinst--devel/virt-unpack 2008-06-26 10:30:45.000000000 -0400
Why isn't this called virt-convert? I don't see any actually "unpacking"
going on here.
Calling it virt-pack is more a historical accident. I think renaming it
to virt-convert makes sense. It'll require some small changes in the
command line switches though, so you cna say from what format and to
what format you want to convert.
David
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
