On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 15:01 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Even if you convince upstream to adopt your grand unified configuration scheme And therein lies the rub. I've been very careful to make sure that Augeas' usability does not depend on any upstream adopting it - they have perfectly valid reasons not to do that, starting with that they can't tell which proposed scheme will actually work out (and therefore deserve their support) Augeas (or any similar config scheme) _has_ to be workable without upstream support - it would be great if we get some eventually [1], but we first need to prove that Augeas is worth their effort. David [1] And for now, it would really only require them shipping a schema with their software, i.e. plonking one text file into /usr/share/augeas/lenses
Cool. It would be really useful to see some doco online about how an upstream could support the forma - and see some sample schemas for, say, Samba / BIND / Apache HTTPD.
Cheers, Mike ________________________________________________ Mike MacCana Technical Specialist Linux Services IBM Global Services Level 14, 60 City Rd Southgate Vic 3000 Phone: +61-3-8656-2138 Fax: +61-4-8656-2423 Email: mmaccana@xxxxxxxxxxx |
_______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
