Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:02:15PM +1000, Mike MacCana wrote:
Using 'widely varying formats' is not 'valuable'. It's an unfortunate
accident that wastes everyone's time with various horrible bandaid
solutions, and occasionally makes destroying user data an 'accepted
limitation' of tools like system-config-named.
Different formats suit different uses, and in any case I wouldn't
trust the people who would develop this new "super-format" not to do
something stupid like using XML.
Rich.
This sounds a lot like what gconfd was made for. How is it different?
Jason
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
