On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:40:15PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:28:18AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Rather that creating a full vmmConnection() object, I think its a > > little simpler to just make the save() method on the vmmDomain() > > object take a flag such as 'background', and if set make it use a > > separate libvirt level connection() object. Same end result, but > > closer to the design we'll need when libvirt gets support for a > > VIR_DOMAIN_SAVE_ASYNC flag on the save() method. > > Something like this? Yep, that does the job, I've applied this. Dan. -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
