Re: [PATCH] Save on separate connection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:40:15PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:28:18AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Rather that creating a full vmmConnection() object, I think its a
> > little simpler to just make the save() method on the vmmDomain()
> > object take a flag such as 'background', and if set make it use a
> > separate libvirt level connection() object. Same end result, but
> > closer to the design we'll need when libvirt gets support for a
> > VIR_DOMAIN_SAVE_ASYNC flag on the save() method.
> 
> Something like this?

Yep, that does the job, I've applied this.

Dan.
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, Boston   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux