Beth Kon wrote: > Sorry if an append appears multiple times... I tried to respond via > gmane (which I'm new to) and it doesn't appear to have made it. My > comment was that it would be better not to fail if the box is found to > be non-NUMA. Seems preferable to just treat that as an effective noop > and not specify a cpuset. This would allow the same command line to work > regardless of whether the box is NUMA or not. > Ah yes, I meant to change that after originally posting the patch but forgot. Fixed now: http://hg.et.redhat.com/virt/applications/virtinst--devel?cs=fc11a2acde42 Thanks, Cole _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
