On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:18:56PM +0100, Soren Hansen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:50:15PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > There is no point choosing a MAC address if you're using user mode > > network because you don't have any control over usermode network > > stack. > > Not true. At least some OS's (Ubuntu to name one) assigns persistent > names to NIC's based on their MAC. It might be convenient for you to be > able to switch between virtual, bridged and usermode networking, but > keep the same MAC (and hence interface name). Again this goes back to the fact that switching between virtual & user mode networking is nonsensical. If you have virtual networking or bridged available, user networking is utterly pointless. If you don't have virtual/bridged available and user networking is your only option then there is no need for persistent MAC because you've got nothing to switch between. The ideal long term plan is to make an implementation of the virtual networking APIs which can be used by unprivileged users too, thus killing any need to use user mode networking at all. User mode networking is a dead end and I've no intention to expose dead end functionality in the UI. Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=| _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
