Jack Neely wrote:
Michael,
While things are floating across my mind...
I know I've heard mention of a SQL backend for the configuration.
That's pretty much a requirement for me as I need to duplicate the
service (2 boxes) for that disaster recovery policy. My shared storage
is AFS (mostly) which..well..likes to eat files that two servers/people
are editing at the same time. And bdb just falls on its face. Who
needs POSIX?
I haven't been all that happy with the bdb/gdb/shelve prototype module
myself, namely, I've seen it
glitch once and that makes me not trust it.
While I was hoping to get out of schema writing/updating, it seems
that's going to be important.
Thanks for bringing this up again... I'll resurrect plans in that area.
--Michael
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
