> To be more specific, I'm doing a tcpdump on guest's > eth0(192.168.122.195). When the host pings 192.168.122.195, I see > following - > > tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode > listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes > 12:15:49.058031 arp who-has 192.168.122.195 tell 192.168.122.1 > 12:15:51.065437 arp who-has 192.168.122.195 tell 192.168.122.1 > 12:15:52.069123 arp who-has 192.168.122.195 tell 192.168.122.1 > 12:15:53.071852 arp who-has 192.168.122.195 tell 192.168.122.1 > 12:15:55.077218 arp who-has 192.168.122.195 tell 192.168.122.1 > > When the guest's eth0 is receiving ARP for it's right IP address, why > is it not responding? > I also tried creating new virtual networks with virt-manager as both "Isolated virtual network" and "Forwarding to physical network". Each time I ping the host's virtual interface which is on the same subnet as the guest's eth0, it fails. On doing a tcpdump on host's virtual interface(vnet2), I see that the guest's ARP *is* coming through, but the host is unable to resolve guest's eth0 IP (192.168.99.128 below). Host's virtual IP is 192.168.99.1. [root@fed-amd64 ~]# tcpdump -i vnet2 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on vnet2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes 01:24:52.588689 arp who-has 192.168.99.128 tell 192.168.99.1 01:24:53.588448 arp who-has 192.168.99.128 tell 192.168.99.1 01:24:54.588226 arp who-has 192.168.99.128 tell 192.168.99.1 Like before it's failing on the ARP. Any pointers greatly appreciated. Thanks, KM _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
