C. Daniel Chase wrote:
As promised, here's the updated patch. FYI, worked great with the
current source from git.
Excellent, thanks ... I'll apply this shortly.
I'm just getting used to git--I use Subversion
most of the time. Do you call it HEAD?
I looked for a revision number to
specify, show you are aware of what the patch was against in case there
were updates prior to my getting this back to you, but could not find
any. Guess git requires some study... :-)
Yeah, git also uses 'HEAD'. As far as I know git users refer to
versions using the
checksums as there is no central authoritative repository as far as git
itself is concerned.
Thanks!
-Dan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
