On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 10:51 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > I don't imagine this multi-VM appliance thing will ever work out and be > useful, but if we did want to do that surely we'd have multiple  That way, the relative position of existing tags doesn't change, though it's really not much of a difference. (Though I find having all the storage in one place a little cleaner) David _______________________________________________ et-mgmt-tools mailing list et-mgmt-tools@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
