On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 13:47 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 21/02/2025 à 07:20, Remi Collet a écrit : > > > AFAIK, $releasever is 10 by default. I maybe I'm seeing this wrong , but $releasever is 10 and repo will have packages distag 10_1 , or $releasever is 10.0 and packages in the repo will have distag 10_0 only no need $releasever_major and $releasever_minor values > > Confirmed on both RHEL-10.0-Beta and AlmaLinux-10.0-Beta > > https://forums.almalinux.org/t/bug-epel-repo-missing-releasever-major-and-releasever-minor-values/5566/3?u=remi > > Sorry, but I think EPEL-10 is broken by design -- Sérgio M. B. -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
