On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 9:34 AM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 09:02, Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> It seems Redhat is not including php-sodium with rhel10. >> >> Poking at the Fedora spec file, this looks to be by design: >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php/blob/rawhide/f/php.spec#_52 >> >> I’m wondering what our options are for packages that depend on it. >> >> Since php-pecl-libsodium was previously deprecated due to php-sodium, should it now be resurrected for rhel10? >> This is probably a question for Remi. > > > I don't know enough about PHP, but if the RHEL-10 PHP isn't compiled with sodium would a version of it need to be compiled somewhere with sodium as a dependency to work? > It should still be possible to build it externally, as the internal PHP extension build system is more or less the same as the external PHP extension build mechanism. But the sources would come from the php source tree. So a php-epel package would need to be made to provide all the extensions missing from the RHEL php package. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
