On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 3:46 AM Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
V Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 09:15:23AM +0100, Paul Howarth napsal(a):
> I got a request to build rgb for EPEL 10
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309102), which is not
> surprising as I did the same for EPEL 9. A local test build of that package
> failed due to a missing dependency of 'pkgconfig(xorg-macros)', so
> I requested an EPEL 10 build of xorg-x11-util-macros to resolve that
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309121).
>
> That package request was then declined:
>
> fedpkg request-branch epel10
> Could not execute request_branch: This package is already an EL
> package, therefore it cannot be in EPEL. If this is a mistake....
>
> Looking at the compose metadata, it appears that xorg-x11-util-macros
> is in CRB, but only for the aarch64 architecture.
>
> So, my questions are:
> 1. Is this intentional (seems unlikely, given that this is fundamental
> to building just about anything using xorg-x11), and
EPEL can barely answer this. You should open a ticket for CentOS Stream at
<https://issues.redhat.com/> against "RHEL" project and "xorg-x11-util-macros"
component.
Looks like xorg-x11-util-macros on aarch64 was missed back in July when it was taken out.
I have opened a merge request to get it out of that final arch.
That will take a week or so to process and be fully out of CentOS Stream 10.
Troy
-- _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
