Re: EL9: conflict gpgme1.22 vs gpgme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:07 AM Leon Fauster via epel-devel <epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 06.02.24 um 16:57 schrieb Leon Fauster:
> Hi troy,
>
> after deinstalling gpgme1.22 I get a broken linkage.
> This link should not happen in the first place, right?
>
>
> # ls -la /usr/lib64/libgpgme*
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root     20  6. Feb 14:35 /usr/lib64/libgpgmepp.so.6
> -> libgpgmepp.so.6.19.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root     19  6. Feb 14:35 /usr/lib64/libgpgme.so.11
> -> libgpgme.so.11.31.0
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 350864 13. Mai 2022  /usr/lib64/libgpgme.so.11.24.1
>
> # rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libgpgme.so.11
> gpgme-1.15.1-6.el9.x86_64
>
>

Ugg ... you are correct.
Looks like the library linker needs to be re-run on post install.
 


It seems that libreoffice-core needs "libgpgmepp.so.6()(64bit)" and dnf
chooses  gpgme1.22 from epel instead gpgme from appstream.


# LANG=C dnf whatprovides "libgpgmepp.so.6()(64bit)"
Last metadata expiration check: 4:43:48 ago on Tue Feb  6 12:21:37 2024.
gpgme1.22pp-1.22.0-1.el9.x86_64 : C++ bindings/wrapper for GPGME
Repo        : epel
Matched from:
Provide    : libgpgmepp.so.6()(64bit)

gpgmepp-1.15.1-6.el9.x86_64 : C++ bindings/wrapper for GPGME
Repo        : appstream
Matched from:
Provide    : libgpgmepp.so.6()(64bit)

I really thought I'd gotten the provides right for that package.
That's not as straight forward as the linker not being run.
I wouldn't mind a hand poking at this so we can get it right.

Troy
--
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux