On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, Leon Fauster via epel-devel wrote:
Just noticed that the current chromium in epel-testing can not be installed
on E9 with rpmfusion repo enabled. All versions before did not have this
problem. It seems the build pulls a new dep (libavformat-free) that conflicts
with ffmpeg-libs of rpmfusion. This results in an incompatibility with
rpmfusion repos. Is this intentional?
From a recent post to this list:
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2023 02:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
From: updates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: EPEL Development List <epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
... ... ...
==============================================================================
chromium-119.0.6045.159-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03f6b44faf)
A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser that Google doesn't want you to use
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Information:
... ... ...
ChangeLog:
* Wed Nov 15 2023 Than Ngo <than@xxxxxxxxxx> - 119.0.6045.159-1
- update to 119.0.6045.159, upstream security release
High CVE-2023-5997, use after free in Garbage Collection
High CVE-2023-6112, use after free in Navigation
- add Requires/Conflicts for ABI break in fmpeg-free 6.0.1
... ... ...
So it does look like an intentional, but needed, incompatability :-(
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
