On neděle 4. června 2023 4:21:54 CEST Todd Zullinger wrote: > bradbell@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I misspelled centos as contos Now fedpkg mockbuild works with the proper links: > > > >>ls -l $HOME/.config/mock > > total 8 > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 19:09 epel-8-x86_64.cfg -> /etc/mock/centos-stream+epel-8-x86_64.cfg > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 19:09 epel-9-x86_64.cfg -> /etc/mock/centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64.cfg > > That's not what you want for epel though. It will build > against centos-stream rather than rhel/alma/rocky, i.e. the > stable EL. While it might appear to work, it will > inevitably build packages which link against the wrong > versions of libraries, pick up bogus dependencies, etc. > > You want to pick one of the *+epel-[89]-x86_64.cfg config > files. > > I thought that previous fedpkg or mock releases printed a > large banner which explained this a bit and linked to > further details? I would have thought that was still in > place, but perhaps not. Mock prints the banner you expect iff the corresponding epel-* symlink doesn't exist (if it exists, user already made the decision). This is at least the desired behavior; if Mock misbehaves, please report. Pavel _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
