On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 5:37 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 17. 03. 23 0:08, Troy Dawson wrote: > > This package has been considered important enough to Red Hat's customers that > > Red Hat has decided to promote it to be an official part of RHEL. > > I know I am late to the party, so feel free to ignore me. > > Is it OK to claim guessed reasons for new packages being added to RHEL? > > I could think of other reasons as well. E.g. it's not important for customers > but it's important for Red Hat. Or maybe it is a not-so-important dependency of > something else. > Does Red Hat have any other motivation with RHEL other than a customer needing the functionality? Those other reasons are generally driven by someone needing it. > What I am trying to say, wouldn't it be generally more accurate to simply state: > > "Red Hat has decided to promote this package to be an official part of RHEL." > > ? This feels cold, which I think is why Troy was trying to add more color here. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
