On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson <tdawson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have cleaned up the epel-next (both 8 and 9) repo's.
>
> If a package was newer in regular epel than in epel-next, the epel-next package was untagged from epel{8,9}-next.
>
> If a package was the same version-release in both epel and epel-next, I made sure the epel version was installable on CentOS Stream {8,9}, I also checked that the epel-next branches were the same as the epel branch, I also checked to see your building style. If everything pointed to "remove it from epel-next", I untagged the epel-next package from epel{8,9}-next.
>
> If the epel-next package was newer than what's in epel, I left them alone.
>
> The vast majority of the cleanup happened yesterday, so you should be able to see a smaller epel-next repo now.
>
> If I untagged a package that you feel should be in epel-next, let me know in the next week or two and I can tag them back.
> If I missed your package and you want me to untag it, also let me know.
Thanks for this Troy!
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
