For the names, the source rpm needs to have the -epel suffice (fence-agents-epel) but then all the "missing" packages have the same name they would have if they were in RHEL or Fedora. So in this case they would be
fence-agents-pve
fence-agents-raritan
fence-agents-rcd-serial
fence-agents-virsh
If you look at my attachment in my previous email I have them set that way.
Troy
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:38 PM Alex Talaran <atalaran@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i dont need them but wasnt sure if required for epel to keep things
complete and similar to the base package. how did you want me to change
the names? i left it the same as in the original spec file, and named
this one -epel after previous discussion on list
On 2022-08-24 17:13, Troy Dawson wrote:
> I'm sure having all the fence agents in one package is nice for you, but
> if someone has both Fedora and RHEL based machines, they would
> appreciate the packages having the same naming conventions.
> This is looking pretty good.
> I'll do some poking about for the man pages. How badly do you want the
> man pages?
>
> Troy
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:40 AM Alex Talaran <atalaran@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:atalaran@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> attached a new spec using 4.10 which should match el9 (desired distro
> version) as you noted.
> srpm and rpm still seem to build fine without man pages, still not sure
> how to generate them.
>
> On 2022-08-08 17:22, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> > I've been looking into this some.
> >
> > What distribution do you want this for?
> > I haven't seen anywhere in your emails saying if this is for RHEL
> 8 or
> > RHEL 9?
> > The spec file you have attached is for fence-agents-4.11, which
> is only
> > in Fedora, so that doesn't let me know either.
> >
> > The major problem is that the fence-agents-pve version has to
> match the
> > fence-agents that is in your version of RHEL.
> > So for RHEL8 (or compatible) it needs to be version 4.2.1. For
> RHEL 9
> > it needs to be 4.10.0
> >
> > We need to start with the correct version of fence-agents and
> work from
> > there.
> >
> > Troy
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:03 AM Alex Talaran <atalaran@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:atalaran@xxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:atalaran@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:atalaran@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > i was able to get this built and installable if anyone wants
> to help
> > test or maintain it.
> > an issue exists with the man pages not being built still but
> im not
> > sure
> > how the makefile target works for these so they are excluded
> for now.
> >
> > maybe some other small tweaks are still needed too since its
> just a
> > (first for me) stripped down and modified upstream spec file.
> >
> > On 2022-07-20 08:47, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Alex Talaran wrote:
> > >
> > >> i ended up with the same error with that change.
> > >
> > > I am sorry my suggestion did not help.
> > > I don't have a Red Hat compatible machine newer that RHEL6
> > > (I moved to Ubuntu for work-related reasons)
> > > so I am unable to test things myself.
> > >
> > >> is it possible its getting confused because the dirname
> in the
> > tarball
> > >> is different than the package name and looking in the
> wrong spot?
> > >
> > > The -n fence-agents-%{version} in
> > > %prep
> > > %setup -q -n fence-agents-%{version}
> > > is supposed to resolve that, but that setup line might
> need tweaking
> > > to match the contents of the tarball.
> > >
> > > It is old and may be somewhat dated, but my bible for
> rewriting
> > .spec
> > > files was the book
> > > Maximum RPM - Taking the Red Hat Package Manager to
> the Limit
> > > a version of which is available at
> > > http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html
> <http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html>
> > <http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html
> <http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/index.html>>
> > >
> > >> On 2022-07-19 23:32, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > >>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2022, Alex Talaran wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> per a previous thread i took a shot at cleaning up the
> > fence-agents
> > >>>> rpm to only include the missing agents and make a new
> package.
> > i am
> > >>>> having some issues with the source url and getting it to
> > build. the
> > >>>> srpm is ok, but when i try to rebuild it into a proper
> rpm i
> > get the
> > >>>> following (output truncated):
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> + py39_byte_compile /usr/bin/python3
> > >>>>
> >
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence
> > >>>> + python_binary='env PYTHONHASHSEED=0 /usr/bin/python3'
> > >>>> +
> > >>>>
> >
> bytecode_compilation_path=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence
> > >>>> + env PYTHONHASHSEED=0 /usr/bin/python3 -s -B -m
> compileall -o
> > 0 -o
> > >>>> 1 -s
> > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64
> > >>>> -p /
> > >>>>
> >
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence
> > >>>> Listing
> > >>>>
> >
> '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence'...
> > >>>> Can't list
> > >>>>
> >
> '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence'
> > >>>> + chmod 0755
> > >>>>
> >
> /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_pve.py /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_raritan.py /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_rcd_serial.py /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_virsh.py
> > >>>> chmod: cannot access
> > >>>>
> >
> '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_pve.py': No such file or directory
> > >>>> chmod: cannot access
> > >>>>
> >
> '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_raritan.py': No such file or directory
> > >>>> chmod: cannot access
> > >>>>
> >
> '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_rcd_serial.py': No such file or directory
> > >>>> chmod: cannot access
> > >>>>
> >
> '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/fence-agents-epel-4.11.0-1.el9.x86_64/usr/share/fence/fence_virsh.py': No such file or directory
> > >>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.S10L6D
> (%install)
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>>
> > >>>> i even tried to comment out the bytecompile lines but
> got the
> > same
> > >>>> error.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> is it possible to get some help sorting this out? i
> have attached
> > >>>> the WIP spec file.
> > >>>> thank you.
> > >>>
> > >>> I would try replacing
> > >>> mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/
> > >>> with
> > >>> mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/fence
> > >>>
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
> >
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>>
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
> > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>>
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>
> > <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure>>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/>
> > List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines>
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue>
>
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
