On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran <atalaran@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the > existing package please? > > i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at > the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in the > spec file [2]. someone else asked about it [1][3] and the ownership is > being thrown back and forth between epel and rhel. > > > [1] > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029251 > > [2] > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents/blob/main/fence-agents.spec.in#L33 > > [3] > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/fence-agents/issues/456 > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure In Fedora fence-agents-pve is a subpackage of fence-agents. fence-agents is in RHEL, so the Fedora package cannot be branched as-is for EPEL. Some possible alternatives: - Open a CentOS Stream bugzilla and request that fence-agents-pve be added to the fence-agents spec file. If the maintainer agrees, it will show up in the next RHEL minor release ("next" being contingent on timing). This is the ideal solution from a packaging perspective but has a fair chance of being declined if RHEL doesn't want to ship/support that subpackage. - Create a stand-alone fence-agents-pve package, and get it reviewed as an EPEL-only package. That would be allowed in EPEL because neither the srpm or rpm name would conflict with RHEL. - Create a fence-agents-epel package that contains all the subpackages that are disabled in the RHEL spec file. Similar to the previous option, this would be EPEL-only and would be allowed because the srpm and rpm names don't conflict with RHEL. - Rebuild the Fedora spec file with all subpackages somewhere where replacing base packages is allowed, such as a copr or a CentOS SIG. -- Carl George _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
