So I'm sorry , ImageMagick-6.9.10 -97 was release more than 2 years ago (2020-02-29 09:40) while ImageMagick-6.9.12 still supported by ImageMagick and have all security the fixes .
you just need rebuild yours packages against the new ImageMagick or just not update ImageMagick with , dnf update --exclude="ImageMagick*" or add the line exclude="ImageMagick*" in the /etc/yum.repos.d
Sometimes we need that things change but is nothing todo with libc and is not us which decide when dynamic libraries change his API .
On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 12:17 -0700, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
Can you explain the rationale for bumping the soname? That is supposed to represent a non-backwards-compatile change; i.e. rare to never (cf. libc.so.6 soon to enter its third decade). This just sounds like a security fix (?)It kind of sucks when RHEL7 and RHEL8 cannot run the same binaries.- PatOn Fri, May 27, 2022 at 12:07 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:yes, now its provide libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.7()(64bit) [2] , you need
rebuild your packages
ImageMagick soname bump was approved [0] in EPEL Steering Committee
meeting. and I'm continuing with the process for incompatible upgrades
from step 4 forward [1]. and 81 security bugs will be fixed
[0]
[2]
On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 11:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Shared message to address an issue below.
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ImageMagick in EPEL
> 8 Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 15:20:54 -0700 From: Patrick J. LoPresti
> <lopresti@xxxxxxxxx> To: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi. I just noticed that ImageMagick in EPEL for RHEL8 uses major
> version number 7, as in "libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.7".
>
> I have a number of binaries compiled for RHEL7 against ImageMagick,
> where the major number was 6, as in "libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.6". These
> binaries do not run on RHEL8 because of this major version mismatch.
>
> Has the .so really changed in a backwards-incompatible way? (When I
> symlink the .so.6 -> .so.7 libraries, all of my RHEL7-compiled
> applications appear to run.) If not, can I request that the version
> in EPEL change to use .so.6?
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Pat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
