Once upon a time, Maxwell G via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > I already brought this up previously, but how will we handle license > identifiers such as MIT that are valid in both SPDX and Fedora but have > different meanings? We won't know whether it's specifically referring to the > MIT/Expat License (SPDX) or a group of MIT-like licenses (Fedora) and we won't > be able to tell which specfiles have been converted to use SPDX identifiers and > which haven't. Would it make sense to make ALL the new tags be SPDX:<tag>, at least for an interim period (of years most likely) where both old and new tags are allowed? -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
