On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04. 05. 22 15:40, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > I just want to make sure that you are querying RHEL 9.0 and not 9.1.
>
> Well, I was querying 9.1, so you have a point. However, with 9.0 it is almost
> the same:
>
> $ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
> --repo=RHEL9.0-{BaseOS,AppStream,CRB,HighAvailability} -a | pkgname | sort |
> uniq ) <(repoquery -q --repo=epel9 -a | pkgname | sort | uniq)
>
> libwmf
> libwmf-lite
> pybind11-devel
> python3-pybind11
> tesseract
> tesseract-devel
> tesseract-langpack-eng
> tesseract-tessdata-doc
>
> $ comm -12 <(repoquery -q
> --repo=RHEL9.0-{BaseOS,AppStream,CRB,HighAvailability}-source -a | pkgname |
> sort | uniq ) <(repoquery -q --repo=epel9-source -a | pkgname | sort | uniq)
>
> libwmf
> pybind11
> tesseract
> tesseract-tessdata
>
>
> The only difference I can spot is anthy-unicode-devel and
> double-conversion-devel, which apparently might be allowed in EPEL 9 for now.
Both of those were requested and added in the last month
(anthy-unicode-devel just this week). That should be reflected in
CentOS Stream 9 now(ish) and a future version of RHEL 9 at some point.
josh
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
