Re: Does EPEL 9 Koji have older c9s packages than local mock?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:22 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to debug a segfault during %check that only occurs in epel9
> Koji, but not in mock.
>
> At the end, I compared the list of packages with:
>
> $ koji list-buildroot 34845388 | sort > koji
> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 shell -- rpm -qa | sort > mock
> $ diff -u koji mock | grep -v ' '
> +acl-2.3.1-3.el9.x86_64
> -audit-libs-3.0.7-101.el9.x86_64
> +audit-libs-3.0.7-102.el9.x86_64
> -binutils-gold-2.35.2-17.el9.x86_64
> -binutils-2.35.2-17.el9.x86_64
> +binutils-gold-2.35.2-19.el9.x86_64
> +binutils-2.35.2-19.el9.x86_64
> -centos-gpg-keys-9.0-9.el9.noarch
> -centos-stream-release-9.0-9.el9.noarch
> -centos-stream-repos-9.0-9.el9.noarch
> +centos-gpg-keys-9.0-12.el9.noarch
> +centos-stream-release-9.0-12.el9.noarch
> +centos-stream-repos-9.0-12.el9.noarch
> -crypto-policies-20220203-1.gitf03e75e.el9.noarch
> +crypto-policies-20220404-1.git845c0c1.el9.noarch
> +cryptsetup-libs-2.4.3-4.el9.x86_64
> -cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.27-19.el9.x86_64
> +cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.27-20.el9.x86_64
> +dbus-broker-28-5.el9.x86_64
> +dbus-common-1.12.20-5.el9.noarch
> +dbus-1.12.20-5.el9.x86_64
> +device-mapper-libs-1.02.183-4.el9.x86_64
> +device-mapper-1.02.183-4.el9.x86_64
> -elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.186-1.el9.x86_64
> -elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.186-1.el9.noarch
> -elfutils-libelf-0.186-1.el9.x86_64
> -elfutils-libs-0.186-1.el9.x86_64
> -elfutils-0.186-1.el9.x86_64
> -epel-release-9-2.el9.noarch
> +elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.186-3.el9.x86_64
> +elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.186-3.el9.noarch
> +elfutils-libelf-0.186-3.el9.x86_64
> +elfutils-libs-0.186-3.el9.x86_64
> +elfutils-0.186-3.el9.x86_64
> -expat-2.2.10-9.el9.x86_64
> -fedpkg-minimal-1.2.0-4.el9.noarch
> +expat-2.2.10-10.el9.x86_64
> -flexiblas-netlib-3.0.4-7.el9.x86_64
> -flexiblas-openblas-openmp-3.0.4-7.el9.x86_64
> -flexiblas-3.0.4-7.el9.x86_64
> +flexiblas-netlib-3.0.4-8.el9.x86_64
> +flexiblas-openblas-openmp-3.0.4-8.el9.x86_64
> +flexiblas-3.0.4-8.el9.x86_64
> -glibc-common-2.34-25.el9.x86_64
> -glibc-gconv-extra-2.34-25.el9.x86_64
> -glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-25.el9.x86_64
> -glibc-2.34-25.el9.x86_64
> +glibc-common-2.34-29.el9.x86_64
> +glibc-gconv-extra-2.34-29.el9.x86_64
> +glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-29.el9.x86_64
> +glibc-2.34-29.el9.x86_64
> -gnutls-3.7.3-6.el9.x86_64
> +gnutls-3.7.3-9.el9.x86_64
> +gpg-pubkey-3228467c-613798eb
> +gpg-pubkey-8483c65d-5ccc5b19
> -krb5-libs-1.19.1-13.el9.x86_64
> +kmod-libs-28-7.el9.x86_64
> +krb5-libs-1.19.1-15.el9.x86_64
> -libgcc-11.2.1-9.4.el9.x86_64
> -libgcrypt-1.10.0-2.el9.x86_64
> -libgfortran-11.2.1-9.4.el9.x86_64
> -libgomp-11.2.1-9.4.el9.x86_64
> +libgcc-11.2.1-10.el9.x86_64
> +libgcrypt-1.10.0-3.el9.x86_64
> +libgfortran-11.2.1-10.el9.x86_64
> +libgomp-11.2.1-10.el9.x86_64
> -libquadmath-11.2.1-9.4.el9.x86_64
> +libquadmath-11.2.1-10.el9.x86_64
> +libseccomp-2.5.2-2.el9.x86_64
> -libstdc++-11.2.1-9.4.el9.x86_64
> +libstdc++-11.2.1-10.el9.x86_64
> -libxml2-2.9.12-4.el9.x86_64
> +libxml2-2.9.13-1.el9.x86_64
> -openblas-openmp-0.3.15-2.el9.x86_64
> +openblas-openmp-0.3.15-3.el9.x86_64
> -openblas-0.3.15-2.el9.x86_64
> -openldap-2.4.59-3.el9.x86_64
> -openssl-libs-3.0.1-12.el9.x86_64
> -openssl-3.0.1-12.el9.x86_64
> +openblas-0.3.15-3.el9.x86_64
> +openldap-2.4.59-4.el9.x86_64
> +openssl-libs-3.0.1-18.el9.x86_64
> +openssl-3.0.1-18.el9.x86_64
> -pyproject-rpm-macros-1.0.0~rc1-1.el9.noarch
> +pyproject-rpm-macros-1.0.1-1.el9.noarch
> -systemd-libs-250-3.el9.x86_64
> +systemd-libs-250-4.el9.x86_64
> +systemd-pam-250-4.el9.x86_64
> +systemd-rpm-macros-250-4.el9.noarch
> +systemd-250-4.el9.x86_64
> -tpm2-tss-3.0.3-7.el9.x86_64
> -zlib-1.2.11-31.el9.x86_64
> +zlib-1.2.11-32.el9.x86_64
>
> This seems like my local mock has newer c9s packages than the Koji build repo.
> Is that expected, or is pulling c9s packages into the build repo stuck on Koji
> side?
>
> Actually, I got an idea that EPEL 9 Koji might already be using (internal?)
> RHEL 9.0, possibly I have missed this switch... However, the
> centos-stream-release package contraditcs taht idea :/
>
> I've checked with an EPEL 9 Next Koji scratchbuild and it got e.g.
> pyproject-rpm-macros-1.0.1-1.el9.

EPEL 9 is frozen on the Feb 24 compose for CentOS Stream 9 until RHEL 9 GA.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux