> On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:31:01 -0600
Erinn Looney-Triggs <erinn.looneytriggs(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> So, thats not a channel that EPEL strives to avoid conflicts with.
We could consider how to
> better avoid conflicts with that channel, but
I'm not sure there's any easy way there.
kevin
Apologies for replying to this old thread, but unless I'm mistaken, this is still a problem. More recently, there were two blog posts from Red Hat that extolled the virtues of adding the EPEL repository into Satellite:
Apparently, however, at least based on our own experience, this is still a problem with RHEL7, 8. Is there anything new on this topic?
Amos
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
