On 3/31/22 02:43, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
[snip]
(*) And while a month seems better, I also see
that timeframe being frustrating to others who
want to use those packages, or to build
dependent packages. No great answers.
This comment is only loosely related to this thread, but as just an end
user I would rather get a "no can do" or a "can do later" on an EPEL
request rather than no response at all.
I have two EPEL 9 requests outstanding with no response now for a week
short of 4 months. Both packages are in EPEL 8 so I considered the
requests very reasonable. I can understand that RHEL 9 changes may have
introduced "difficulties" but some response, any response, would be nice.
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
