Hello maintainers! I'm glad to announce that the native s390x builders are now available in Fedora Copr production. Seems everything works, so we also added the 'epel-8-s390x' and 'epel-9-s390x' chroots. Note that the builders are hosted in IBM Cloud, Tokyo, so the connectivity between builder and the rest of the Copr stack (North Virginia) might be a bit slower (or behave differently). Ditto for RPM repositories that are not mirrored. Overall, this is an early attempt so please be patient and report issues: https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issues Happy building! Pavel On Monday, January 17, 2022 2:18:04 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hello all! > > Red Hat subscribed builders (for EPEL 8) have been deployed to production. > So any EPEL 8 build in Fedora Copr is now done against RHEL 8 + EPEL 8. As > always, please report back any issues. > > There's though some problem related to the s390x native builders. Please > stay tuned on that part... For now, s390x stays emulated (and as I noticed > later after the announcement, we haven't enabled the epel-8-s390x chroot, > yet - so there's no regression at least). I hope these issues will be > resolved by the end of the week. > > Happy building, > Pavel > > On Monday, January 10, 2022 11:22:03 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hello maintainers. > > > > Currently, we build all EPEL variants against CentOS "base" in Fedora > > Copr, i.e. epel-* configs means CentOS+EPEL. By the end of January 2022 > > CentOS 8 mirrors will start disappearing, pushing us to change the configs > > to avoid build failures. > > > > We would like to start the migration to the RHEL base as soon as possible, > > so we are at least a bit "ahead" the change. So we can start resolving > > the issues. > > > > There doesn't seem to be a real blocker, or known issue. > > > > - We got enough subscriptions from Red Hat for Fedora Copr purposes to > > start building against official RHEL channels. > > > > - The Mock + configs is stuck in Bodhi for now, but it doesn't block > > Copr to apply for the change earlier. This is mostly about community > > decision that 'fedpkg mockbuild' is not aligned, yet, not that Mock is > > broken. > > > > - The remaining problem seemed to be the s390x architecture, as the > > emulation being _currently_ done wouldn't work with Red Hat > > subscriptions, see details in [1] discussion. But thanks to IBM > > sponsoring us IBM Cloud access we should be OK to deploy the s390x > > arch support in Fedora Copr at the same time with the EPEL change > > (this will go in a separate announcement). > > > > **So the plan is to move to RHEL + EPEL next Monday, 2022-01-17.** If > > everything works well at least. > > > > Side note from me... Note that EPEL 9 in Fedora Copr is still CentOS > > Stream 9 + EPEL 9 ATM. This will change to "RHEL 9 + EPEL 9" once RHEL 9 > > is generally available (subscribed content). Might seem as a > > complication for users, but it's actually not - it is good thing we can > > start working on EPEL 9 now. So I want to congratulate to EPEL community > > here, the fact we have stream in place allows us to bring EPEL 9 up before > > actually RHEL is available. That's an awesome step (jump) forward > > compared to previous releases! > > > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/7T5N6SCPCWHNAUIFPFD54Z6CTLLZMJ6F/ > > > > Pavel > > > > _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
