Hello, I happened to hit a request for adding web-assets-devel binary package of web-assets component to EPEL 9 (bug #2036086) while web-assets-filesystem binary package is shipped in RHEL. I recall it is allowed, but ones need to follow some rules which I cannot find now. Current Packaging guide lines <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packaging/> do not document this particular case. The closest one is adding missing architectures (Limited Arch Packages section). Do you know the rules for adding the missing subpackages? I remember that release number needs to be kept lower. What about component (source package) name. Can I use reuse it, or do we need to rename it to keep Koji happy in case it has imported CentOS builds? I guess I should disable subpackages already shipped by RHEL. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
