On 13. 12. 21 15:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I have two questions regarding epel9:
1) I have requested dozen of epe9 branches for my packages. It was 20+ hours
ago. E.g. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/39402
Is it manual process? Or is the automation broken?
The tickets are processed by automated scripts that are run manually by a
couple of heroes. This quite unfortunately combines disadvantages of both
automated and manual approach:
- it takes a long time for requests to be processed
- nobody needs to check the requests for sanity
A FESCo ticket that touches this topic is https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2115
2) It was quite pain to go through all my packages and find which ones actually
have EPEL version. And which ones are in RHEL9 now...
Note that fedpkg request-branch epel9 *should* fail if the component is already
present in CentOS Stream 9:
[python3.9 (rawhide)]$ fedpkg request-branch epel9
Could not execute request_branch: This package is already an EL package,
therefore it cannot be in EPEL. If this is a mistake or you have an exception,
please contact the Release Engineering team.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
